2019年12月ACT回顧

2019 年 12 月 ACT 考題回顧:所有 4 篇閱讀文章!

過去這個週末學生考了 2019 年 12 月的 ACT 考試。如果這是你最後一次考 ACT,恭喜你完成了一個艱難的任務!

我們整理了 2019 年 12 月 ACT 考試當中的 4 篇閱讀文章,幫助學生準備未來的考試。


這些閱讀文章可以如何的幫助你?

1. 這些文章可以讓你知道你的英文程度以及準備考試的程度

首先,讀這些文章。你覺得他們讀起來很簡單還是很難?裡面有沒有很多生字,尤其是那些會影響你理解整篇文章的生字?如果有的話,雖然你可能是在美國讀書或讀國際學校、也知道 “如何讀跟寫英文”,但你還沒有足夠的生字基礎讓你 “達到下一個階段” (也就是大學的階段)。查一下這一些字,然後把它們背起來。這些生字不見得會在下一個 ACT 考試中出現,但是透過真正的 ACT 閱讀文章去認識及學習這些生字可以大大的減低考試中出現不會的生字的機率。

2. 這些文章會告訴你平時應該要讀哪些文章幫你準備閱讀考試

在我們的 Ivy-Way Reading Workbook(Ivy-Way 閱讀技巧書)的第一章節裡,我們教學生在閱讀文章之前要先讀文章最上面的開頭介紹。雖然你的 ACT 考試不會剛好考這幾篇文章,但你還是可以透過這些文章找到它們的來源,然後從來源閱讀更多相關的文章。閱讀更多來自這些地方的文章會幫助你習慣閱讀這種風格的文章。

3. 這些文章會幫助你發掘閱讀單元的技巧(如果閱讀單元對你來說不是特別簡單的話)

如果你覺得閱讀單元很簡單,或是你在做完之後還有剩幾分鐘可以檢查,那麼這個技巧可能就對你來說沒有特別大的幫助。但是,如果你覺得閱讀很難,或者你常常不夠時間做題,一個很好的技巧是先理解那一種的文章對你來說比較難,然後最後做這一篇文章。ACT 的閱讀文章包含這五種類型:

  • 社會研究:人類學,考古學,傳記,商業,經濟,教育,地理,歷史,政治學,心理學和社會學。
  • 自然科學:解剖學,天文學,生物學,植物學,化學,生態學,地質學,醫學,氣象學,微生物學,自然史,生理學,物理學,技術和動物學。
  • 散文小說:短篇小說或短篇小說的摘錄。
  • 人文:回憶錄和個人散文,以及建築,藝術,舞蹈,倫理,電影,語言,文學批評,音樂,哲學,廣播,電視和戲劇等內容領域。

舉例來說,假設你覺得跟美國獨立相關的文章是你在做連續的時候覺得最難的種類,那你在考試的時候可以考慮使用的技巧之一是把這篇文章留到最後再做。這樣一來,如果你在考試到最後時間不夠了,你還是可以從其他比較簡單文章中盡量拿分。


所有 2019 年 12月 ACT 考試閱讀文章

Passage 1

This passage is adapted from the novel Love Marriage by V. V. Ganeshananthan (©2008 by Vasugi Ganeshananthan). 

        He met her, my mother, in New York City, and the

Heart said plaintively: Thump thump thump. That was

not the sound of illness. Theirs was an auspicious meet-

ing, although no one had troubled to check the alignment

of the stars; the young woman was

twenty-seven—old for a prospective bride?—but she

did not look it. She had a generous face, he said to

himself. 
        He liked her glossy sheaf of dark hair, her sparse

brows, her pronounced chin, her full lower lip. She

smiled with her mouth closed because she did not like

her teeth. He could already see within the structure of

her face how she would become thinner, that her bones

would give her older face a certain elegance, a chiseled

and austere severity. He liked her precision in even the

smallest of tasks, like arranging hibiscus in a vase. Her

reserve, her inability to say anything truly personal in

public. He thought she might be full of secrets and

wanted to know them. She never raised her voice, but

she did not speak softly. How are you? That’s a beautiful

sari. How are the children? I like this rice. She liked

her food steaming and spicy. as he did. She made her

own clothes, staying up late into the night, her foot on

the pedal of a sewing machine that had belonged to her

mother and had crossed the ocean with her. Her hem-

lines suited both the times and her young pale slimness,

which reminded him of a flowering tree by his home in

Jaffna. He never caught her admitting she was wrong:

her words clambered around that impossibility, but so

sheepishly that he found it endearing. In a noisy room

he learned to tell the clear bell sound of her bangles

apart from the rest.

        Suddenly, he was no longer thinking about widows

or about repeating his own father’s collapse. It was as

though an invisible conductor was directing the pulling

of strings to draw them together. Whether it was Murali

who managed to get introduced to Vani or the other way

around, no one else really remembers. And they will

never admit which one of them was responsible. And

yet, it was this simple: a friend of his noticed that they

were staying near each other. Perhaps Murali could give 
Vani a ride home? Yes, yes. two heads nodded. They

left the party they were at too quickly to say all their

good-byes. After the door closed behind them the space

where they had been was filled with the laughter of

friends. 
        He took her home. She boarded with a family in

Brooklyn. During the car ride they were silent. It was a

strange and comfortable silence for two people who had

waited for so long to be alone. The thrum of the motor

was loud because the car was old. When they turned

around the corner he pulled over and turned the engine

off and there was a quiet as loud as the motor had been.

He walked her to her door and she thanked him. She did

not ask him in for a cup of coffee: it was not her house.

But it was out of his way and both of them knew it. She

forgot that she did not like her teeth and bared them at

him. Her smile, for once, was not self-conscious. She

watched him drive away, waving from the window.

        The Sri Lankan elders of New York City were all

too eager to play parents to the couple. She was Proper:

smart and polite and a good cook and lovely. Vani had a

job. and more important than any of these things, she

had grace, which was something that could not be

taught. Murali, of course, was the Beloved Parentless

Boy: their favorite bachelor-doctor whom they took into

their homes and bosoms and tried to smother with welcome

and curry. Occasions were arranged: even the

very rooms seemed to conspire to make the two end up

next to each other. And then one day something was

suggested by one of those elders. And somehow the

pair of them were talking about it. To each other.

Directly.

        Which was a faux pas. But neither of them

minded. 
        Oceans away, families exploded. True to form, his

family’s discord faded quickly. But her family almost

did not consent: afraid of the Improper, they questioned

his intentions, his failure to observe certain formalities.

his ancestry, his habits and his character. He heard

about what they had said and turned to her, his eyes full

of questions.

        They may not know these things about you. she

said, but I do.

        Are you sure? he asked her. The unsaid: they may

not forgive you for this.

        Positive, she answered. Countries away. Vani’s

brother crashed into Murali’s brother’s house, yelling:

Who is this doctor who wants to marry my sister? Who

is this doctor who is in love with my sister?

        The nerve of Murali, they thought. In Love? These

were not words they were used to saying.


Passage 2

Passage A is adapted from the article ‘Our Vanishing Night’ by Verlyn Klinkenborg (©2008 by National Geographic Society. Inc.). Passage B is adapted from the book The End of Night: Searching for Natural Darkness in an Age of Art:facial Light by Paul Bogard (©2013 by Paul Bogard). 

Passage I

         For most of human history, the phrase “light pollution”

would have made no sense. Imagine walking

toward London on a moonlit night around 1800. when it

was Earth’s most populous city. Nearly a million people

lived there, making do, as they always had, with candles

and rushlights and torches and lanterns. Only a few

houses were lit by gas. and there would be no public

gaslights in the streets or squares for another seven

years. From a few miles away, you would have been as

likely to smell London as to see its dim collective glow.

         Now most of humanity lives under intersecting

domes of reflected, refracted light, of scattering rays

from ovcrlit cities and suburbs, from light-flooded

highways and factories. Nearly all of nighttime Europe

is a nebula of light, as is most of the United States and

all of Japan. In the south Atlantic the glow from a

single fishing fleet—squid fishermen luring their prey

with metal halide lamps—can be seen from space, burn-

ing brighter, in fact, than Buenos Aires or Rio de

Janeiro. 
         In most cities the sky looks as though it has been

emptied of stars, leaving behind a vacant haze that mirrors

our fear of the dark. We’ve grown so used to this

pervasive orange haze that the original glory of an unlit

night—dark enough for the planet Venus to throw shadows

on Earth—is wholly beyond our experience. And

yet above the city’s pale ceiling lies the rest of the uni-

verse, utterly undiminished by the light we waste—a

bright shoal of stars and planets and galaxies, shining in

seemingly infinite darkness.

          We’ve lit up the night as if it were an unoccupied

country, when nothing could be further from the truth.

Among mammals alone, the number of nocturnal

species is astonishing. Light is a powerful biological

force, and on many species it acts as a magnet, a

process bring studied by researchers such as Travis

Longcore and Catherine Rich. The effect is so powerful

that scientists speak of songbirds and seabirds being

“captured” by searchlights on land or by the light from

gas flares on marine oil platforms, circling and circling

in the thousands.

Passage II

         Unless Vincent Van Gogh’s The Starry Night from

1889 is traveling as part of an exhibition, it hangs at

home on its wall at the Museum of Modern Art

(MoMA) in Manhattan as fifty million people pass by

every year. On a Saturday morning I stand near Van

Gogh’s scene of stars and moon and sleeping town,

talking with its guardian for the day. Joseph. as he 

repeats. “No flash, no flash: “Two feet away.” and

“Too close, too close” again and again as people from

around the world crowd near. -What’s the appeal of this

painting?” I ask. “It’s beautiful,” he says. “What more

can you say than that?”

         You could rightly leave it at that. But I love the

story this painting tells, of a small dark town, a few

yellow-orange gaslights in house windows, under a

giant swirling and waving blue-green sky. This is a

painting of our world from before night had been

pushed back to the forest and the seas, from back when

sleepy towns slept without streetlights. People are too

quick. I think. to imagine the story of this painting—

and especially this sky—is simply that of “a werewolf

of energy:’ as Joachim Pissarro. curator at the MoMA

exhibition Van Gogh and the Colors of the Night. would

tell me. While Van Gogh certainly had his troubles, this

painting looks as it does in part because it’s of a time

that no longer exists, a time when the night sky would

have looked a lot more like this. Does Van Gogh use his

imagination? Of course. but this is an imagined sky

inspired by a real sky of a kind few of the fifty million

MoMA visitors have ever seen. It’s an imagined sky

inspired by the real sky over a town much darker than

the towns we live in today. So a painting of a night

imagined? Sure. But unreal?

        In our age, yes. But Van Gogh lived in a time

before electric light. In a letter from the summer of

1888. he described what he’d seen while walking a

southern French beach: 

         The deep blue sky was flecked with clouds of a

blue deeper than the fundamental blue of intense cobalt,

and others of a clearer blue, like the blue whiteness of the

Milky Way. In the blue depth the stars were sparkling, greenish.

yellow, white, pink, more brilliant, more sparkling gemlike than

at home—even in Paris: opals you might call them, emeralds,

lapis lazuli. rubies, sapphires.

         It’s remarkable to modern eyes. first of all, that

Van Gogh would reference the stars over Paris—no one

has seen a sky remotely close to this over Paris for

at least fifty years. But stars of different colors? It’s true.


Passage 3

This passage is adapted from the essay ‘On Places. Photographs. and Memory’ by Chris Engman (©2012 by Chris Engmany )

         Recently I visited a place that I knew intimately in

childhood, a waterfall with cliffs on both sides and a

pool of cold water below. We used to jump from those

cliffs despite our parents’ concerns. I loved this place,

and revisiting it I am amazed by all that I can remember.

Bends in trails, sap stains on bark, crooks in

branches, the intricate web of root structures, the shape

of trees—all are startlingly unchanged and I remember

them precisely. A small tree is in the middle of the trail.

I put my hand on it for support and drops of moisture

fall on my back from above, and I realize: I have done

this before. I remember the sensation precisely, the

sound of rustling leaves above, the freshness of the

smell, the temperature of the droplets, the mixture of

apprehension and pleasure. Standing on a rock ledge

getting ready to jump. I reach for a handhold so I can

lean over the edge and prepare myself for what I am

about to do. The shape of the rock where my hand

touches it is known to me: I have performed this ritual.

          Places hold memories better than people and better

than photographs. Family, or people from our past who

may remind us of events in our lives and with whom we

may reminisce, are themselves constantly changing, as

is their version of events. Conversations with others

about shared experiences of the past can seem to augment

memory but quite often, more often than we probably

realize, they operate in the opposite way: they alter

or even replace our own memories with those of

another. Whatever the event, one’s memory of it is

inevitably altered through conversation: recalling the

same event at a later date, it becomes difficult or impossible

to distinguish an original memory from the altered

version that emerged.

         Photographs act on us in a similar fashion. What-

ever their apparent precision or correctness, photographs

inaccurately reflect experience from the start.

They convert the three dimensions of space into two

and eliminate the third spatial dimension and time. Also

sacrificed are smell, touch. sound. and context. In a

word, a photograph is an abstraction of experience. Yet

we take them compulsively. We fill scrapbooks and

hard drives with family outings, vacations, ballgames—

Scotty in front of Niagara Falls, Dad and Grandma

smiling in front of the famous restaurant—in the hope

of freezing time, making experience tangible for future

reference, preserving memory. I do it. too. But it is well

to realize that photographs do not preserve memory.

they replace memory. lust as photographs are an

abstraction of experience, they are even more so an

abstraction of memory—a dangerously compelling

abstraction. Memories are fragile and impressionable.

They cannot hold up against the seemingly irrefutable

factuality of a photograph. It isn’t that what is in a photograph

is false: a photograph’s version of events did

happen. what is in a picture did indeed pass before the 

lens. The problem is that photographs only tell such a

small part of any story. And while they may be technically

correct, nonetheless they deceive. Does a smile in

a photograph mean that a person is happy? Or does it

mean that a photographer prodded. “look up and

smile”? Was the fish I caught really bigger than my

uncle’s, or did I cleverly, intentionally hold mine closer

to the lens? Photographs deceive in another respect.

Whatever the event one wishes to preserve, snapshots

are most commonly a break from that event. The

moment that a photograph is taken is experienced as a

moment taking a photograph, not as a moment engaged

in the activity implied by the resulting image. Time

taken to make photographs is time subtracted from the

experience of the thing being photographed. What photographs

most accurately record. ultimately, is nothing

more than the act of photography, itself.

         To be sure, photographs can form a record of our

lives that has value, and I cherish my old snapshots as

much as the next person. But as image-makers and consumers.

which all of us are these days. there is also

value to be had in a recognition of the limits of photography

to the facility of memory—in an understanding

of what images can and cannot offer us in this regard.

Moreover it is precisely the deceitfulness of photography

as it pertains to memory that gives the medium its

unique platform to address the nature of memory itself:

its malleability, its unreliability, its elusiveness. It

seems to me that no conversation or photograph can

make memory so vivid or recognizable, so physically

palpable, as the return to a place.


Passage 4

This passage Is adapted from the article ‘Reinventing the Lear by Antonio Regalado (©2010 by Scien-tific American. a division of Nature America. Inc.). 

         Nathan S. Lewis has been giving a lecture on the

energy crisis that is both terrifying and exhilarating. To

avoid potentially debilitating global warming, the

chemist says civilization must be able to generate more

than 10 trillion watts of clean, carbon-free energy by

2050. That level is three times the U.S.’s average

energy demand of 3.2 trillion watts.

         Before Lewis’s crowds get too depressed, he tells

them there is one source of salvation: the sun pours

more energy onto the earth every hour than humankind

uses in a year. But to be saved, humankind needs a

radical breakthrough in solar-fuel technology: artificial

leaves that will capture solar rays and chum out chemical

fuel on the spot. much as plants do. We can burn the

fuel, as we do oil or natural gas, to power cars, create

heat or generate electricity, and we can store the fuel

for use when the sun is down. 
         Lewis’s lab is one of several that are crafting prototype

leaves, not much larger than computer chips.

designed to produce hydrogen fuel from water. rather

than the glucose fuel that natural leaves create. Unlike

fossil fuels, hydrogen burns clean. Other researchers

are working on competing ideas for capturing the sun’s

energy. such as algae that has been genetically altered

to pump out biofuels. or on new biological organisms

engineered to excrete oil. All these approaches are

intended to turn sunlight into chemical energy that can

be stored, shipped and easily consumed. Lewis argues,

however, that the man-made leaf option is the most

likely to scale up to the industrial levels needed to

power civilization.

         Although a few lab prototypes have produced

small amounts of direct solar fuel—or electrofuel. as

the chemicals are sometimes called—the technology

has to be improved so the fuel can be manufactured on

a massive scale, very inexpensively. To power the U.S..

Lewis estimates the country would need to manufacture

thin, flexible solar-fuel films, instead of discrete chip-

like devices, that roll off high-speed production lines

the way newsprint does. The films would have to be as

cheap as wall-to-wall carpeting and eventually cover an

area the size of South Carolina. 
         Far from being a wild dream, direct solar-fuel

technology has been advancing in fits and starts ever

since President Jimmy Carter’s push for alternative

energy sources during the 1970s oil shocks. Now, with

a new energy and climate crunch looming, solar fuel is

suddenly gaining attention.

         In photosynthesis, green leaves use the energy in

sunlight to rearrange the chemical bonds of water and

carbon dioxide, producing and storing fuel in the form of sugars.

“We want to make something as close to a

leaf as possible,” Lewis says, meaning devices that

work as simply. albeit producing a different chemical

output. The artificial leaf Lewis is designing requires

two principal elements: a collector that converts solar

energy (photons) into electrical energy (electrons) and

an electrolyzer that uses the electron energy to split

water into oxygen and hydrogen. A catalyst—a chemical

or metal—is added to help achieve the splitting.

Existing photovoltaic cells already create electricity

from sunlight, and electrolyzers are used in various

commercial processes, so the trick is marrying the two

into cheap. efficient solar films.

         Bulky prototypes have been developed just to

demonstrate how the marriage would work. Engineers

at a Japanese automaker. for example, have built a box

that stands taller than a refrigerator and is covered with

photovoltaic cells. An electrolyzer. inside, uses the

solar electricity to break water molecules. The box

releases the resulting oxygen to the ambient air and

compresses and stores the remaining hydrogen, which

the automaker would like to use to recharge fuel-cell

Cars. 
         In principle, the scheme could solve global warm-

ing: only sunlight and water are needed to create

energy. the by-product is oxygen, and the exhaust from

burning the hydrogen later in a fuel cell is water. The

problem is that commercial solar cells contain expen-

sive silicon crystals. And electrolyzers are packed with

platinum, to date the best material for catalyzing the

water-splitting reaction, but it costs $1.500 an ounce.

         Lewis calculates that to meet global energy

demand, future solar-fuel devices would have to cost

less than $1 per square foot of sun-collecting surface

and be able to convert 10 percent of that light energy

into chemical fuel. Fundamentally new, massively scalable

technology such as films or carpets made from

inexpensive materials are needed.


2019 年 12 月 ACT 考試閱讀題目

Ivy-Way 學生在上課的過程就會做到 2019 年 12 月以及其他的官方歷年考題。除此之外,我們也有讓學生來我們的教室或在家做模考的服務讓學生評估自己的學習進度並看到成績。如果你想預約時間來我們的教室或在家做模考,請聯繫我們!如果你想購買考題在家做,學生可以在Ivy-Way蝦皮商城Ivy-Way臉書粉專、或 Line (ivyway) 直接購買喔!


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *